All Posts (DonKeebals)


(1) 2 3 4 ... 95 »


 
Re: Now that Obama is on record stating that influencing American elections will not be tolerated
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
Don K: Truthfully, I'm much less interested in what the Dems did or didn't do in this case - because they're not the ones who will be running the country for the next 4 years. If they had won, I'd be much more inclined to want to dig through every little indiscretion. In any case, don't spend too much time, or make yourself crazy over it ... but just to humor me, where did you learn all of those facts?



A: The first part of your first sentence I believe 100%. Not only that but I knew it before you ever posted it. That is the thinking of 99.9% of all liberals. I'm surprised you risk having your liberal privileges revoked by such a public admission.

B: Your second sentence is total and complete horseshit. But, that's exactly what I would expect from a liberal.

C: I spend very little time on this and it doesn't require much anyway.

D: Everything I posted came from news reports both internet and broadcast/tv. Of course you have act quickly to see it as the next 23 hours of news coverage was about something Trump tweeted or a puff piece about President Jesus walking on water again.

Posted on: Today 9:54 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Now that Obama is on record stating that influencing American elections will not be tolerated
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
Quote:

EERY wrote:
Inspector general to review DOJ, FBI handling of Clinton case
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews ... se.amp.html?client=safari


Interesting. I hope it's done carefully & without bias. You realize that non-Fox media is portraying this as a means of exposing Comey's alleged attempts to undermine Clinton, right? Both side are spinning the heck out of this.

It would be nice to know the actual truth, either way.



At first I thought you were joking when you typed this then, I realized you are trapped in the same fog of denial as the rest of the liberals.

Here is the truth we know so far:

*Clinton campaign emails were hacked

*The hacked emails show that the Clinton campaign conspired along with the liberal biased media and the DNC to influence votes in the primary in favor of Hillary.

*Cell phones that were subpoenaed as part of the investigation were intentionally destroyed.

*Computers that contained emails which were also subpoenaed were erased using Bleach Bit.

*Liberals and their cooperative media buddies focus only on the hacking of emails and completely ignore what those emails reveal.

*There have been no legal repercussions for anyone in the DNC, The Hillary ,or the liberal media outlets all of whom conspired to INFLUENCE THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES IN HILLARY'S FAVOR.

*From the day the email hacking surfaced until 11/8/2016 liberals and there media buddies tried to sweep the hacking under the rug saying there was nothing to it and the emails revealed "nothing".

*11/9/2016: Oh $#it!!! We must do something about the Russians, Donald Trump is not a legitimate President!!


How about we wait & see what turns out to be true, Like I said, I hope it's done carefully and without bias.


Everything I posted is true and without bias. Hell, I didn't even include the parts about CNN providing debate questions to Hillary in advance.
That's the best you are going to get the without bias. The media is strictly controlled by liberals so the this will be swept under the rug so they can focus on Trump.

Posted on: Ystrday 10:23 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Nobel Peace Prize for Trump???
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

Sandstone56 wrote:
I was on topic!! Right wing people think its OK for Republican presidents to start wars and cause deaths o tens of thousands of our troops. This is a little known fact to right wingers; The Nobel peace prize is rarely given to people that start wars. They are sometimes given to people who try to end them. The only president that started a war that may have deserved a Nobel peace prize is FDR because of the nature of the enemies at that time. Now when DT becomes president he will likely follow the last four republicans presidents and start a war and cause the deaths of thousands of our troops just as the last four Republican presidents have done. The last great Republican president was Ike. He was A real combat general and know the terrible things that happen in war. Draft dodgers that claim they know more than the generals don't have a clue.



Nope, still off topic. C- for effort though!!

Posted on: 1/14 9:11 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Nobel Peace Prize for Trump???
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:
I mean, Bronco Bama has murdered A LOT more people than DT and he has one.


Sure - & give it to him before he even takes office for good measure. I mean, his success is a foregone conclusion right, so why wait?


Exactly my point, that's how Bronco got his. He then goes on to bypass congress and attack Libya as well as order drone strikes that result in killing more civilians than bad guys. What a peaceful guy!!!

Talk about ignorance and delusion.

Posted on: 1/14 9:10 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Now that Obama is on record stating that influencing American elections will not be tolerated
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
Quote:

EERY wrote:
Inspector general to review DOJ, FBI handling of Clinton case
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews ... se.amp.html?client=safari


Interesting. I hope it's done carefully & without bias. You realize that non-Fox media is portraying this as a means of exposing Comey's alleged attempts to undermine Clinton, right? Both side are spinning the heck out of this.

It would be nice to know the actual truth, either way.



At first I thought you were joking when you typed this then, I realized you are trapped in the same fog of denial as the rest of the liberals.

Here is the truth we know so far:

*Clinton campaign emails were hacked

*The hacked emails show that the Clinton campaign conspired along with the liberal biased media and the DNC to influence votes in the primary in favor of Hillary.

*Cell phones that were subpoenaed as part of the investigation were intentionally destroyed.

*Computers that contained emails which were also subpoenaed were erased using Bleach Bit.

*Liberals and their cooperative media buddies focus only on the hacking of emails and completely ignore what those emails reveal.

*There have been no legal repercussions for anyone in the DNC, The Hillary ,or the liberal media outlets all of whom conspired to INFLUENCE THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES IN HILLARY'S FAVOR.

*From the day the email hacking surfaced until 11/8/2016 liberals and there media buddies tried to sweep the hacking under the rug saying there was nothing to it and the emails revealed "nothing".

*11/9/2016: Oh $#it!!! We must do something about the Russians, Donald Trump is not a legitimate President!!

Posted on: 1/14 9:06 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Nobel Peace Prize for Trump???
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

Sandstone56 wrote:
Give it to George Bush He started all the wars. Obama has been trying to extract our forces so he may have some fault. Republicans have started every war in the last 40 years. One war for George Bush, Two for George H. W. Bush and one for Ronnie.
Now try to figure out who is the murdering president. I know this is to hard for you. Try George Bush for killing the most people in the last forty years,


I know it's difficult for you liberals but, please try to stay on topic.

Posted on: 1/12 6:46 pm
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Nobel Peace Prize for Trump???
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
I mean, Bronco Bama has murdered A LOT more people than DT and he has one.

Posted on: 1/12 6:14 pm
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Now that Obama is on record stating that influencing American elections will not be tolerated
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

EERY wrote:
It would be very bipartisan of him.


And quite miraculous.

Posted on: 1/12 8:49 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Now that Obama is on record stating that influencing American elections will not be tolerated
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
When do we see action taken against the Hillary campaign, CNN et AL?

I mean, we do know that they conspired to bendy Hillary in the primaries.

Posted on: 1/11 5:23 pm
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Transition Trouble
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
It's gonna get ugly, y'all. Come 1/20, we'll have a government led by by unprepared, delusional folks with no idea how the sausage making actually works. Enjoy!

Link



Do you beat yourself with a riding crop every time you see or hear Trump's name??


I do not. How about you? Do you jizz yourself each time he lies to you?



Whatever you say Buffalo Hillbilly. I think your houseguest needs to put some lotion on its skin.


p.s. While you fondle with your hose again.


Um - what does that even mean? Just curious: Do you have to put a lot of work into maintaining your preferred level of ignorance or does it occur naturally?


You ask to have a post explained to you and then call me ignorant? That's funny.

Posted on: 1/7 8:56 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Transition Trouble
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
It's gonna get ugly, y'all. Come 1/20, we'll have a government led by by unprepared, delusional folks with no idea how the sausage making actually works. Enjoy!

Link



Do you beat yourself with a riding crop every time you see or hear Trump's name??


I do not. How about you? Do you jizz yourself each time he lies to you?



Whatever you say Buffalo Hillbilly. I think your houseguest needs to put some lotion on its skin.


p.s. While you fondle with your hose again.

Posted on: 1/5 10:34 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Transition Trouble
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
It's gonna get ugly, y'all. Come 1/20, we'll have a government led by by unprepared, delusional folks with no idea how the sausage making actually works. Enjoy!

Link



Do you beat yourself with a riding crop every time you see or hear Trump's name??

Posted on: 1/4 7:46 pm
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Ohio State Attack
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Looks like another successful refugee screening like the one in Virgina a couple of weeks ago.


Has anyone checked on John Podesta? I know he really gets his hopes up for white dudes with guns in these situations.

Posted on: 11/29/2016 7:18 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Refusing to accept the result of the election is a threat to our democracy.
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004

Posted on: 11/27/2016 10:25 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Jack says... Official unofficial Oklahoma game day thread
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Right now you would have a difficult time convincing me that we weren't paid to throw this game. That is the only explanation I have for that much stupidity in one place, it has to be intentional.

Posted on: 11/19/2016 9:31 pm
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Holgy to Oregon?!?!?
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
I like Holgs but, it doesn't make sense. Oregon is just 2 years removed from playing for a NC and they are going to hire a guy who's never won his conference? In addition to that he doesn't even have a winning record in his conference. I think the talking heads are just throwing his name out there because of his offensive philosophy.

Posted on: 11/17/2016 1:30 pm
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Savage warns Trump on Priebus. It looks like Jeb Bush won
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

EERY wrote:
Supporting Trump was suppose to be a move on the status quo. It concerns me that a Trump would place the head of the RNC in such a position. How does everyone else feel about this move by Trump?


Absolutely terrible. I've not heard one name mentioned so far that sounds promising. This is not a total surprise though, as I never heard anything from him during the campaign that was promising either.

Posted on: 11/15/2016 7:44 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Election Day
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

Elbow_Jobertski wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:
So, the liberals who celebrated their candidate winning what we now know was a rigged primary are now protesting the results of a legitimate election.

That makes sense.


Given how much violence was promised and predicted had the election gone the other way, a few protests are hardly worth worrying about. I don't want to contemplate how ugly it would have gotten had Trump won the popular vote and lost the EC. There is some pretty strong evidence Trump would not handle it with anywhere near the grace that Hillary has, and it is reasonable that his attitude would spark some serious dissent:


Looks like it's getting pretty ugly to me. I guess that whole, "Refusing to accept the result of the election is a threat to our democracy" only applies when your side wins. Maybe if we give them all participation trophies they'll go home.

Posted on: 11/13/2016 9:24 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Question for the resident attorneys
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:
Quote:

Elbow_Jobertski wrote:
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
I would assume that the subpoena is for a civil matter for which you are not a party. (Because if it was a criminal matter you would probably be discussing a warrant and not a subpoena, and if it was a civil matter for which you were a party than you would be receiving discovery and not a subpoena.) Is this correct?


More or less. It could also, hypothetically speaking, be a congressional subpoena.

If this were a targeted criminal investigation, the FBI would likely quietly get a warrant and seize the devices without warning. A security review of e-mail practices would be, hypothetically speaking, not really civil or criminal, but possibly could turn into either if evidence supports same.


Subpoena or warrant, both are court orders. Correct? It would seem to me that timing and intent would be of importance. If I get a new phone then destroy my old phone after the new phone is up and running then, 6 months after I have destroyed the old phone there is a court order for it there's not much you can say. But, if I get a court order for my phone then I destroy it knowing it is now completely useless then my intent was to prevent you from having access to it.

Maybe the law doesn't see it that way which is why I'm asking.


This is actually a very complex and complicated area of law and has changed several times over the last ten years or so. The general rule is that a person or entity can follow their regular course of action in destroying electronic data. If you get a new cell phone, then you can destroy the old one or transfer the sim card or whatever you want. Business entities typically have written policies that they follow in that regard, such as automatically deleting emails after 180 days. Once you get sued, however, you must take reasonable steps protect the data that may be relevant in the case. If not, it is called spoliation of evidence and you can get sanctioned. If you receive a subpoena in a civil matter, it (usually) means you are not a party. If you don't respond by producing the data, then you can be brought into court to respond. The court can order that you produce it. If you destroy it at that point, there will be consequences. If you destroy it beforehand there might be, but probably nothing major. But this analysis relates to a civil matter. I am not sure what would happen if you did it in response to a congressional subpoena. I think it would probably play out in the court of public opinion, but I may be wrong.


Thanks for the explanation. That said seems like it's pretty easy to destroy potentially criminal evidence with no real repercussions.

Posted on: 11/11/2016 10:32 am
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Election Day
Pitt Hater
Joined:
5/3/2008 8:47 am
From Parkersburg,WV
Posts: 2004
Quote:

eer_4da_beer wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:
Quote:

Elbow_Jobertski wrote:
Quote:

DonKeebals wrote:


Not relevant. They represent the party of acceptance, inclusion and tolerance. They should have those values even when their candidate losses. They are also the same people who told Sanders supporters to "get over it" and "move on" when he lost a rigged primary.


Nice you admit to a double standard, but the claims that the primary was rigged are absurd. Sanders didn't even campaign in the south, and his losing those states by such a huge margin made it almost impossible to win the nomination. The DNC did a few questionable things, but to believe that they made the difference when Hillary won by such a large margin overall is not reasonable.



No it's not absurd. It has been proven that the DMV was purposely attaching the deck in Clinton's favor. That's not questionable, that's corrupt. Questions were leaked to the Clinton camp by the media and the were in communication on his to avoid prior noticing the bias. You can sketchers all you want in what effect it had but the fact remains those things happened and they should never happen in a US election.

Trump throwing out some dickheads tweets four years ago is not even remotely the same as the **** show taking place in cities across the country now.


Totally agree. Donna Brazile was the source and she was justifiably fired by CNN. She will likely never work in legitimate media again...which is just.

Do you have any problems with the Trump camp being in touch with Russia during the campaign? Concerns me a bit.

Do you see celebrations by ISIS and Russia after Trumps victory a little unsettling? I do.

But I'm not crapping all over Trump. I hope he delivers on many of the promises that he made during the campaign instead of cozying up to the establishment republicans...which is more likely to happen in my opinion.


I have all sorts of issues with Trump being President included those you listed. I find him to be just as criminal as Hillary which is why I voted for Gary Johnson(Again).

Posted on: 11/10/2016 7:30 pm
_________________
High Fructose Corn Syrup Aggies like it in the corn hole.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 



 Top
(1) 2 3 4 ... 95 »




Login
Username:

Password:

remember me





Copyright © 2004-2011 wemustignitethiscouch.com All Rights Reserved