All Posts (joedaddyski)


(1) 2 3 4 ... 114 »


 
dangerous hillary
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
This woman is down right insane. Excerpt(CNN/clinton news network) from one of her now many interviews crying about how she lost.

Clinton, in her interview with Gross, adds that there are likely no avenues, however, for her to challenge the 2016 results if she feels she needs to.

"Basically I don't believe there are. There are scholars, academics, who have arguments that it would be, but I don't think they're on strong ground," she told Gross. "But people are making those arguments. I just don't think we have a mechanism."

Clinton also mentioned that the Kenyan Supreme Court overturned their recent presidential election and ordered a new vote.

"What happened in Kenya, which I'm only beginning to delve into, is that the Supreme Court there said there are so many really unanswered and problematic questions, we're going to throw the election out and redo it," Clinton said. "We have no such provision in our country. And usually we don't need it."

Kenya - really, we want to use Kenya as a yardstick to our election. She is just flat out mental ill. That's right she is a liberal(my mistake she is a progressive, no that's bernie, no bernie is an independent that tried to run on the democratic ticket, really he is a socialist, never mind he is mentally ill too) therefore she is.

Posted on: Ystrday 11:25 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: ESPN pulls Robert Lee from UVA game
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

sg44gold wrote:
ESPN might want to do some research into just what a "Cavalier" is.

They might be surprised to find out.


If I had to guess they picked the very last one(Dancing partner). Ha-ha.

Definition of cavalier


1

:
a gentleman trained in arms and horsemanship


2

:
a mounted soldier
:
knight


3
capitalized
:
an adherent of Charles I of England


4

:
a lady's escort or dancing partner
:



Posted on: 8/25 11:34 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: ESPN pulls Robert Lee from UVA game
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

BlueShark wrote:
Meh. I don't have a problem with it considering a young woman was murdered during a terrorist attack by a protestor who was protesting the removal of Robert E. Lee's statue in that very same city. If nothing else it's respectful.

Respectful? - I know this should be saved for the soap box but, for this reply you should be forced to eat a bag of d--ks.
This Asian had as much to do with this event as the man on the moon and now he is relegated to doing another none event football game in shittsburgh. What a joke. Oh, that's right poor Robert Lee and Espn made a mutual decision - yeah you go to shittsburgh or you are shitcanned.
I was never at the table but, I am sure this was the mutual decision.
How would you feel, because of your name, you would not attend a conference or something important at work. I'll bet you would be the first to scream - ooooo this is so discriminatory.

Posted on: 8/24 11:16 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Charlottesville
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

brobison wrote:
Quote:

eer_4da_beer wrote:
Quote:

Are they chanting this because they want to kill police for being police? Or are they protesting the continual killing of black Americans with no repercussions by the police?

Your side wants to kill people for how they were born (the racists...not the cops in general), not for what they have done. Sorry you can't comprehend the difference,



Hmmmm.....do these police we HAVE to protest against and denigrate ONLY kill black people in error or as an excessive use of force?

Brobison - there is no talking sense to free beer. He's so far left that he labels moderates alt right.
His post make for good laughter though.

Posted on: 8/17 12:13 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Charlottesville
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256

Posted on: 8/16 6:10 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: 1984
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
“The masses never revolt of their own accord, and they never revolt merely because they are oppressed. Indeed, so long as they are not permitted to have standards of comparison, they never even become aware that they are oppressed.”
― George Orwell, 1984

Posted on: 8/16 8:17 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Transgender Children
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
wvufan1818 - man you are asking for it now. I'm going to sit back and watch how these progressives get all in your face.


Why? I don't disagree with what he said.

Maybe you are coming around.

Posted on: 8/8 11:11 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Transgender Children
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
wvufan1818 - man you are asking for it now. I'm going to sit back and watch how these progressives get all in your face.

Posted on: 8/4 3:46 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:

Nice, revert to sophomoric humor. I like the reference though, that was one of the best movies ever. As for bitter, I'm not bitter, I'm just tired of being asked to spend more money/taxes on senseless healthcare,(call it what you want but one more penny spent, of mine, is one more that I don't get to spend on the things I need) By the way cutting off ones Johnson does not sound like healthcare to me. No matter how you slice it. Pun intended.


Here is my impression of you responding to your argument, meaning arguing my side:

So you are saying that active duty military and veterans aren't entitled to health care? You think they should just go fight and get hurt and then they are on your own? You Republitards are so selfish and privileged--go fight my battles but don't expect me to pay for it. How **** patriotic. This is why the country is so screwed up. This is why we can't have nice things. The bridges are crumbling but you want your avocado toast and caramel latte too much to realize. When will you wake up and realize you are ruining everything about everything. It is all your fault. Everything is all your fault.

Not close. Why don't you just stay on your side.

Posted on: 8/4 10:55 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
I think my penis is to small so should the military health care plan allow for an extension? Come on ears, when does it stop?


I don't think the surgery for transgender is considered elective by healthcare professionals. I think it is considered medically necessary. Increasing the size of a little Johnson is not. I may be wrong. I just don't think we should be picking and choosing medical treatment for soldiers and veterans based on the popularity of the treatment among the public.

So, IF I hear you correctly, you do not like the idea of our military doing gender reassignment. Is that correct?


No. I could care less if they pay for gender reassignment. I could care less if they pay for Viagra prescriptions for ED. The only principle I am stating is that if the military is going to pay for medical treatment for its soldiers and veterans, then the standard should be uniformly applied, and the standard should not be based on the public opinion polls.

Glad, you cleared that up. In other words, you could care less what our health care pays for, gotcha, typical liberal mentality, whatever you want as long as the collective pays for it. That is the reason we are in the sh!t hole mess we are in and can't provide basic health care at a reasonable price. Oh, lets pay for an addadicktome or a new hole. That is just effing stupid.


First, you aren't thinking logically. It cannot be what I "want" if I don't care either way. How is that possibly my way? Jesus, you people insist on making up the other side's position and then mischaracterizing your own made up BS. I am not saying the military should pay for anybody's healthcare. I am saying IF IT DOES...

Second, we aren't talking about "our healthcare." We are talking about military healthcare, or Tricare. That is different. Active duty military get healthcare as a job benefit through Tricare. All I am saying is that what is covered and what is not covered shouldn't be determined by the public popularity of the procedures. That is arbitrary. It should be determined by some other factor, like medical necessity or medical benefit or something similar, and it should be a decision made by a doctor, not by the general public.

So, my position is that if we promise our soldiers that they will get medical treatment, then they should absolutely get the medical treatment that they need as determined by their doctor. Stop mischaracterizing it and arguing with that and save Stanley some bandwidth.

EDIT: As far as being ok with paying taxes, yes, I have no problem paying my very small share of taxes needed to provide medical care to soldiers and veterans. I also don't think it entitles me, or qualifies me, to question the necessity of the treatment. If we as a nation promise to give them care, then we owe them that care.

So you don’t care? Really. You seem to have a lot of thoughts on this subject. You people, who is - you people? And what the heck is this statement “I am not saying the military should pay for anybody's healthcare. I am saying IF IT DOES...” Well, the military does pay for healthcare just like any other organization but, the difference is that the collective pays for it through taxes.
I know we are not talking “our healthcare” but, you make it like it isn’t part of the sum. That is where I think you are totally wrong, if you don’t think it is part of the sum then you need to re-think how things work. As for what is covered and what is not, when does it stop? How about this for an example: We go from a society that has a low populace of obese people to one that is 1 in 3 but, because it is now labeled as a disease it’s treated completely different. The easiest way to correct obesity is to push your fat ass away from the table. Oh, no let’s put a rubber band around the stomach and force these people away from the table, now how much sense does that make? Not much in my book. Then the complications that these lap band patience now have. What an effing waste of money. And yes, WE ALL PAY FOR IT, SOMEHOW OR OTHER. Yes, in caps because you seem to think just a little more in taxes is all it takes. When is enough to you flaming liberals? Working until the middle of May, each year, isn’t enough. You have to be off of your rocker if you want more taxes. That is what you said isn’t it?
A doctor calling for someone to lap off their Johnson or put a hole where once there was a Johnson is just plain crazy. If you think this is between a doctor and patient have at it, but, I feel like the doctor should be working on a way to convince/cure these people and work with them to realize they were born this way for a reason and that reason was not to have something removed or added. Is this making any sense to you? I didn’t think so. And as for bandwidth – back at you.


Your new Delta Tau Chi name is "Dunning Kruger." You might try listening more and espousing less--it might make you less bitter.

Nice, revert to sophomoric humor. I like the reference though, that was one of the best movies ever. As for bitter, I'm not bitter, I'm just tired of being asked to spend more money/taxes on senseless healthcare,(call it what you want but one more penny spent, of mine, is one more that I don't get to spend on the things I need) By the way cutting off ones Johnson does not sound like healthcare to me. No matter how you slice it. Pun intended.

Posted on: 8/2 3:11 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
I think my penis is to small so should the military health care plan allow for an extension? Come on ears, when does it stop?


I don't think the surgery for transgender is considered elective by healthcare professionals. I think it is considered medically necessary. Increasing the size of a little Johnson is not. I may be wrong. I just don't think we should be picking and choosing medical treatment for soldiers and veterans based on the popularity of the treatment among the public.

So, IF I hear you correctly, you do not like the idea of our military doing gender reassignment. Is that correct?


No. I could care less if they pay for gender reassignment. I could care less if they pay for Viagra prescriptions for ED. The only principle I am stating is that if the military is going to pay for medical treatment for its soldiers and veterans, then the standard should be uniformly applied, and the standard should not be based on the public opinion polls.

Glad, you cleared that up. In other words, you could care less what our health care pays for, gotcha, typical liberal mentality, whatever you want as long as the collective pays for it. That is the reason we are in the sh!t hole mess we are in and can't provide basic health care at a reasonable price. Oh, lets pay for an addadicktome or a new hole. That is just effing stupid.


First, you aren't thinking logically. It cannot be what I "want" if I don't care either way. How is that possibly my way? Jesus, you people insist on making up the other side's position and then mischaracterizing your own made up BS. I am not saying the military should pay for anybody's healthcare. I am saying IF IT DOES...

Second, we aren't talking about "our healthcare." We are talking about military healthcare, or Tricare. That is different. Active duty military get healthcare as a job benefit through Tricare. All I am saying is that what is covered and what is not covered shouldn't be determined by the public popularity of the procedures. That is arbitrary. It should be determined by some other factor, like medical necessity or medical benefit or something similar, and it should be a decision made by a doctor, not by the general public.

So, my position is that if we promise our soldiers that they will get medical treatment, then they should absolutely get the medical treatment that they need as determined by their doctor. Stop mischaracterizing it and arguing with that and save Stanley some bandwidth.

EDIT: As far as being ok with paying taxes, yes, I have no problem paying my very small share of taxes needed to provide medical care to soldiers and veterans. I also don't think it entitles me, or qualifies me, to question the necessity of the treatment. If we as a nation promise to give them care, then we owe them that care.

So you don’t care? Really. You seem to have a lot of thoughts on this subject. You people, who is - you people? And what the heck is this statement “I am not saying the military should pay for anybody's healthcare. I am saying IF IT DOES...” Well, the military does pay for healthcare just like any other organization but, the difference is that the collective pays for it through taxes.
I know we are not talking “our healthcare” but, you make it like it isn’t part of the sum. That is where I think you are totally wrong, if you don’t think it is part of the sum then you need to re-think how things work. As for what is covered and what is not, when does it stop? How about this for an example: We go from a society that has a low populace of obese people to one that is 1 in 3 but, because it is now labeled as a disease it’s treated completely different. The easiest way to correct obesity is to push your fat ass away from the table. Oh, no let’s put a rubber band around the stomach and force these people away from the table, now how much sense does that make? Not much in my book. Then the complications that these lap band patience now have. What an effing waste of money. And yes, WE ALL PAY FOR IT, SOMEHOW OR OTHER. Yes, in caps because you seem to think just a little more in taxes is all it takes. When is enough to you flaming liberals? Working until the middle of May, each year, isn’t enough. You have to be off of your rocker if you want more taxes. That is what you said isn’t it?
A doctor calling for someone to lap off their Johnson or put a hole where once there was a Johnson is just plain crazy. If you think this is between a doctor and patient have at it, but, I feel like the doctor should be working on a way to convince/cure these people and work with them to realize they were born this way for a reason and that reason was not to have something removed or added. Is this making any sense to you? I didn’t think so. And as for bandwidth – back at you.

Posted on: 8/1 11:29 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
I think my penis is to small so should the military health care plan allow for an extension? Come on ears, when does it stop?


I don't think the surgery for transgender is considered elective by healthcare professionals. I think it is considered medically necessary. Increasing the size of a little Johnson is not. I may be wrong. I just don't think we should be picking and choosing medical treatment for soldiers and veterans based on the popularity of the treatment among the public.

So, IF I hear you correctly, you do not like the idea of our military doing gender reassignment. Is that correct?


No. I could care less if they pay for gender reassignment. I could care less if they pay for Viagra prescriptions for ED. The only principle I am stating is that if the military is going to pay for medical treatment for its soldiers and veterans, then the standard should be uniformly applied, and the standard should not be based on the public opinion polls.

Glad, you cleared that up. In other words, you could care less what our health care pays for, gotcha, typical liberal mentality, whatever you want as long as the collective pays for it. That is the reason we are in the sh!t hole mess we are in and can't provide basic health care at a reasonable price. Oh, lets pay for an addadicktome or a new hole. That is just effing stupid.

Posted on: 7/31 3:25 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

Eers88 wrote:
Quote:

joedaddyski wrote:
I think my penis is to small so should the military health care plan allow for an extension? Come on ears, when does it stop?


I don't think the surgery for transgender is considered elective by healthcare professionals. I think it is considered medically necessary. Increasing the size of a little Johnson is not. I may be wrong. I just don't think we should be picking and choosing medical treatment for soldiers and veterans based on the popularity of the treatment among the public.

So, IF I hear you correctly, you do not like the idea of our military doing gender reassignment. Is that correct?

Posted on: 7/31 10:16 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
I think my penis is to small so should the military health care plan allow for an extension? Come on ears, when does it stop?

Posted on: 7/30 8:18 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Why not give all the females boob jobs.

Posted on: 7/29 6:46 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Virginia Tech 9/3/2017
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
It's was the cheerleaders in 1980. They held up posters with let's go then turned around with another that said mountaineers. I remember very well, first game at then the new mountaineer stadium. We were so confused 😐 Effing cheerleaders screwed it up.

Posted on: 7/27 12:14 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Quote:

delispam wrote:
Funny that a guy who pays hookers to pee on him and ran away from the military because he had "bone spurs" on his pussie is suddenly an authority on normal and who's fit to serve.

Did he really do that? You know, have hookers pee on him? Can you provide proof? Have you ever had bone spurs on your pussie?

Posted on: 7/26 12:22 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
This is really dangerous, NOT.
"After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military," Trump wrote in a series of Twitter posts.
Try do tear this one up.
I am so glad we did not elect a president that thinks anything not normal should be shoved down our throats, literally. Ha-ha.

Posted on: 7/26 9:36 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Trump pressured Comey to end Flynn investigation
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
Some guys talk deflection but, whenever someone with a right leaning slant says anything that doesn't fit your narrative you label it conspiracy theory. So tell me how does that works? Open your mind guys, you always think everything is done with no intentions of malice, which is sometimes the furthest from the truth.
So back to what sg44gold wrote. Do you not think any of that is not possible? I beg to differ and I am not a conspiracy theorist, like you are labeling me. I just seek the truth and I know there are truly evil people out there and will do anything to further their cause or agenda.
Please open that mind that you always claim to be open.

Posted on: 7/18 7:22 am
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Trump pressured Comey to end Flynn investigation
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2256
You are funny.

Posted on: 7/17 12:47 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 



 Top
(1) 2 3 4 ... 114 »




Login
Username:

Password:

remember me





Copyright © 2004-2011 wemustignitethiscouch.com All Rights Reserved