All Posts (delispam)


(1) 2 3 4 ... 47 »


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
1818 If you can't explain something in your own words you don't understand it.

I get the feeling there's a lot you don't understand.

It's easy to tell when you're re-posting from your propaganda hub because even though it's still fantasy it sounds so much more articulate.

Posted on: 7/1 10:25 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Proof 1818 doesn't think for himself...You can't really call yourself a free thinker when you literally copy and paste stuff from The_Donald.




Quote:

wvufan1818 wrote:
"There is no agenda created by the left"

Meanwhile in the real world

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BAPJwSzjBWw

If anyone is curious, I've actually dived into their playbook to find out the why's to the odd trends we see with hypocritical/double standard acceptance of anti-white and anti-male sentiment in the media.


1 The far left is actively infiltrating the mainstream leftist initiatives using very vague, twisted, and misleading rhetoric that is more palatable than their exposed, core, extreme beliefs.

2 The far left is and has been actively trying to close and shift left the Overton Window so that only emotionally reasoned leftist perspectives are acceptable and topics based in logic instead of emotion (like free speech, scientific approaches/explanations to gender and sex, using non-inflated and accurate measures on statistics to make sure they are as accurate as possible rather than politicized, etc.) are banished. Their version of what is acceptable near entirely leaves out all centrist and surely all right-leaning perspectives.

3 They are leading a campaign to specifically liken centrism, moderate conservatism, libertarianism, and regular conservatism to nazi and fascist philosophies as a way of spearheading a socially accepted witch-hunt against anyone who isn't in line with their beliefs.

4 They get their beliefs from something called critical theory in academic studies. This is code for Marxist studies. Their goal is to subtly instill socially Marxist ideals into American society by discouraging merit-based advancement in society and endorsing a diversity-hire/equity of outcome-based hiring and screening paradigm in order to promote Marxist thinkers and practitioners into positions of power and gate keeping (this is how we've, for example, managed to see former empires like the Star Wars franchise crash and burn because of one SJW/Marxist feminist). The far left is doing this with media companies and other executive level and HR-level positions where they can create entire board rooms of SJW/Marxist circle-jerk discussion where anti-male and anti-white sentiment can flourish unchallenged and unquestioned and even build such double standard belief systems into corporate policy and procedure (e.g., the new Netflix "no staring at people for more than 5 seconds rule" policy they recently put in place). Detractors are fired or purged by the Marxist gatekeepers or by HR departments that are largely left-leaning and respond to inflated SJW employee complaints with "zero-tolerance" responses (e.g., the James Damore situation at Google).

5 The far left is choosing to wage this cultural war via Cultural/Social Marxism because it is a more subtle strain of Marxism that goes less noticed and is harder to talk about and is more easily brushed off as a conspiracy than going full Marxist and advocating for de-facto Marxism. They also know that full blown de facto Marxism is not feasible and would lead to them being caught in their scheme quicker than what they are doing now.

6 Their end goal is to eliminate all merit-based advancement across the board and to enact their version of equity by bringing down the hard-working and the high-achieving to their level rather than asking how they can achieve the same sorts of things by also working hard.

7 Their goal is to demonize white identity, specifically cis, white, male identity and use it as a scapegoat explanation for whenever something goes wrong on their course to full enactment of their Marxist visions and ideations.

8 They've shifted the semantics of words such as racism, sexism, discrimination, and even sexual assault and rape so that only those who they pre-approve can claim to be victims of those kinds of oppressions and grievances in society. For example, many cultural/social Marxists reject the notion that white people can be victims of racism. They've done this by encouraging something called prejudice plus power as a new way of defining terms like racism, sexism, rape, etc. This agenda is pushed at the college/academic level in institutions across the world but mainly in America.

9 "Intersectional feminism" launched a coup on the normal, regular movement for women's equality by fully integrating the notions of prejudice plus power into second wave and third wave feminist theory. This caused the movement to go from "giving women equality in all respects as men" to "let's talk about how and why I am a victim and why men are to blame for that". Modern intersectional feminism is a major example of what happened when prejudice plus power touched a formerly focused movement that wanted to ensure the equality of women and transform it into an "modular API" of sorts where anyone who feels like they are a victim can hop on the back of feminism and use it as a replacement for egalitarianism. They've since demonized the notion of egalitarianism as a word and practice of what they call the "alt-right". They do this deliberately to dissuade any discussion that might deviate from the intersectional feminist religion. They will play no true Scotsman all day and claim that anyone who doesn't specifically think like them, but still identifies as a proponent of women's rights, isn't a feminist. It's messed up and is a toxic example of the above points.

10 Some of the more extreme factions of feminists believe in some truly destructive notions such as stopping having sex with white men because of skin color, political lesbianism, and post-coital retraction of affirmative consent if there is regret involved with the interaction.

11 Cultural Marxists, despite any of their claims, usually force their subscribers/practitioners to identify as specifically intersectional feminists or face the equivalency of getting "shunned" by members of a hardcore cult. Proof of such can be seen in how intersectional feminists talk about TERFs (trans exclusionary radical feminists) and other factions of feminism.

12 Cultural Marxists, despite any of their claims, actually oppose the constitution of the United States. Proof of this can be seen at institutions like Oberlin and Vassar, where they openly have shredded the constitution and endorse rejecting the constitution as a triggering and oppressive document.

13 Cultural Marxists are aiming for a completely separate set of end/victory goals for America. Their victory goals mainly define the very unraveling of American society, American borders, a destruction of the American culture and ways of life, and a redefining of American values based off of modern contextual interpretations to cherry-picked sections of the constitution that they can twist to fit their values.

14 Cultural Marxists hate true diversity, especially of thought and when someone goes against or questions their principles. When a woman is a conservative they call her self-hating, experiencing internalized-misogyny, and other worse names. When an African American is conservative, Cultural Marxists often patronize and/or mock the person for being misled, self-hating, or influenced/brainwashed by white people.

15 Cultural Marxists will go out of their way to dox and stalk you and attempt to get you fired and/or ruin your life if you gain too much power in a movement that opposes them or ask questions that would potentially expose a major weak spot to exploit.

If you try to point any of this out to them or talk to a left-leaning person about this, you will see these sorts of patterns in how they rationalize or brush off genuine questions or discussion attempts about most/any of the above:

1 Cherry picking a quote to pick out 1 to 2 words that they think invalidates the premise of the argument or question. (Hill, zwaa, eers, deli, 4da)

2 Will try to shut down any counter by claiming one is misinterpreting something, doesn't know what they are talking about, etc.

3 Will dismiss the questioning as an attempt to "attack" or "troll" and that such "attacks" are giving into the "alt-right" or "fascist" mindset.

4 If 3 doesn't work, they've begun to use kafkatrapping terminology by dismissing questions as being those from a "red pilled" "incel" "men's rights" angle and will use that as justification to halt the discussion and offer no further explanation.

5 Will say they "don't have time" to "debate" or "explain" X or will ask one to "Go Google X".

6 Will say "it's not my responsibility to educate you about X but rather your responsibility to educate yourself about X" (equivalent to a parent telling their child after a child asks what they did wrong, "You figure it out, you're smart! I'm punishing you anyways even if you can't tell me what you did wrong!")

7 They will try to invalidate the premise of your argument because of having post history in TD or other conservative areas and/or they will go one step further and comment dump your comment history on a non related thread to attempt to miscontextualize or spin or toxify your past words in front of everyone as a way to discredit what you are presently saying (happens to me all the time).

Sources:

Netflix "no staring for more than 5 seconds at anyone" policy proof: https://www.inc.com/suzanne-lucas/netf ... th-grade-on-steroids.html

Regretful sex being weaponized as rape: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteve ... on&utm_term=.0f6c3559b788

Actual Marxist article that attempts to poison the notion of merit: https://theconversation.com/the-proble ... -gender-bias-either-45364


Lap up that echo chamber propaganda!! Yuuuuuum-yum!

Posted on: 6/30 5:50 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Quote:

sg44gold wrote:
And you are talking about the Bush, Ryan, Muller, etc side of the GOP, NOT the Trump side (and growing) of the GOP.

BIG difference.

At least we know the Dems ALL want the same thing ... OPEN BORDERS!!!


Your emperor god president loves hiring illegal immigrants. See the articles above. He also relied heavily on his products being manufacturered over seas. But he talks about building a wall right?







Posted on: 6/24 10:20 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
They'll tell you they're tough on illegal immigration and will spend billions of your hard earned tax dollars on a useless wall to get their base's dicks hard and then Trump and buddies will go on hiring illegal immigrants and benefiting from it greatly.

They don't want a immigration policy that's tough on the people who hire the workers cause they want illegal immigrants to hire. They know the immigrants will still find a way to get here as long as there's companies hiring them.

The last thing they want is to make harsh consequences for actually being the ones to be responsible for giving the illegal immigrants incentive to come here in the first place.



Here's my solution- if your company is found guilty of hiring illegal immigrants you are fined. The fine includes these costs:

-The cost of a K through 12 education for every child your workers have.
-Healthcare expenses for every illegal worker and their family members for a year.


I personally don't give a crap because I don't have a job that can be done by a guy who doesn't have a college degree and speak English but I won't believe the GOP and gang really want to stop this unless they go after the people who give them jobs, which they won't.

Posted on: 6/23 10:07 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Unless the government goes after the companies that hire illegal aliens with the same tenacity they go after people trying to immigrate illegally it won't change.

Posted on: 6/21 9:46 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
I wasn't pretending. I know better but it seemed like you needed something to make your life a little better so I did it because I feel sorry for you and it's the least I could do for someone who is so often made fun of and marginalized.

Posted on: 6/20 9:40 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Cool. So you feel better when someone calls you what you prefer? Proves my point.

I think it's a little weird you wanted anther guy to call you daddy but it didn't hurt me in the slightest to do it.

It's up to you to deal with whatever demons make you want a guy to call you daddy so I'll just leave figuring that out to you since it's no concern to me.

I'm sure it's difficult dealing with those kinds of problems so I'm just going put up with the weirdness because I'm strong enough of a man to support people with as many problems as someone like you.

Just like you could do with transsexuals.

Good talk.

Posted on: 6/18 12:34 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Daddy, you're trying to establish order of status with yourself higher on the ladder than anther person daddy.

But that doesn't work daddy cause I'm just doing what you want and it's really easy to do.

Here daddy, you're asking me to give you a higher status than myself without earning it. Trans-people just want to be treated like people too, daddy.

Daddy, you want to strip them of their identity to keep them in check and establish them on a lower status level than yourself. Which is a dick move, daddy.

Also yes daddy, Transsexuals, do have a high percentage of mental illness but are not all technically mentally ill using modern standards.

Also, daddy, when someone is secure in their status they don't give a sh1t what someone else wants to be called even if the secured status person thinks it's stupid. And gay.

Posted on: 6/17 9:49 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
That's a lot of words for "I'm a little **** who is afriad of transsexuals".

Posted on: 6/16 4:32 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
I can't make you understand any of those things but even if the science was on your side I ask again- how does someone else wanting to be called a different pronoun or gender personaly threaten you in any way?

Posted on: 6/16 10:28 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
How does it threaten any person secure in their sexuality and their place in the afterlife to call anther person what they prefer to be called?

Posted on: 6/16 1:03 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Quote:

wvufan1818 wrote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=HUwtUPgaiEE

Thanks for your magic wand, President Trump.


"The jobs report is complete fiction."

-President Donald J. Trump

Posted on: 6/9 10:30 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077

It honestly doesn't matter if you're liberal or conservative these days. We're all losing.

We haven't had any purely Conservative or liberal legislation since money took over our politics.

As long as the playing field is equal for everyone either pure approach would be better than what we currently have which is a pay for play system.

I'll support whoever is working for the people and not corporations. I'm not sure there's many politicians out there that fit that description on either side of the isle.

Posted on: 4/13 11:56 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
You call it a wisdom gap but what you really mean is that you have strong opinions supported by little to no evidence so you built your own matrix of something subjective like "wisdom" to back up your opinions which are clearly based on your own emotions and feelings.



Posted on: 4/9 2:01 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: The Wisdom Gap
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
DGUs?

How do you gun guys always find yourselves in problems requiring guns to solve them?

Posted on: 4/3 8:47 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Rich Rod Gets Walking Papers (Merged)
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Maybe he'd be interested in being our next OC?

Posted on: 1/3 10:00 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Rich Rodriguez fired from Arizona
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
If these allegations are true looks like WVU dodged a bullet when he left.

Posted on: 1/3 9:06 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Net-neutrality!
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Quote:

sg44gold wrote:
Quote:

hill_William wrote:
I live in NYC / Manhattan, (the center of the media universe)



Ah, you must live near the Fox News studio!

Ha! Ha! Lucky you!


on that one SG!

Side note: considering each network's bias isn't it ironic Fox is in a deep blue area and CNN is based out of a super red state?

Posted on: 12/23 7:12 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Net-neutrality!
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
I'm curious how many cable providers and phone companies you guys have to choose from in your areas?

Posted on: 12/17 5:45 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Net-neutrality!
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1077
Quote:

wvufan1818 wrote:
"Net neutrality" is not what's up for repeal. What's being debated is a repeal to classifying ISPs as public utilities. What that does is lovely things like requiring federal oversight in order to lay new fiber. That means only the big players like Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon have the resources necessary to jump through the legal hoops to get new fiber approved. Title II also requires FTC oversight from ISPs, which, among other things, let's them sell your personal data to third parties.

So-called 'net neutrality" is everything the left opposes. But, of course, Soros-funded operations with Orwellian names like "Fight for the Future" and "Battle for the Net" are so effective they've got people convinced that black is white and down is up. Read the Communications Act of 1934 for yourself. Title II begins on page 35. It doesn't even explicitly forbid ISPs from charging different amounts for different websites, so that argument is invalid to begin with.



It doesn't forbid it because of it's current classification as a public utility. Changing the classification is what opens it up to charging different amounts.

Posted on: 11/22/2017 3:37 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 



 Top
(1) 2 3 4 ... 47 »




Login
Username:

Password:

remember me





Copyright © 2004-2011 wemustignitethiscouch.com All Rights Reserved