We Must Ignite This Couch Message Boards

« 1 ... 13 14 15 (16) 17 »

 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
8/22/2007 7:48 pm
From Frederick, MD
Posts: 2441
Well old Donald's taxes turned out to be a big nothing burger. Our lib friends like Sandy must be sooo bummed. The Donald paid FAR more percentage wise in 2005 than Obama, and Bernie the Socialist did in 2015. What's up with your liberal heros? Bernie at 13%!! HAHA he sure played all you rubes. 13%! Give. Me. A. Break. You should be screaming about Bernie's taxes - not Trump's for crying out loud.

$38 MILLION dollars to the fed treasury. I'd say The Donald paid bigly in 2005! The libs should be applauding our President. That's an awful lot of money redistributed to your favorite non-working poor person.

Anymore tax questions for the Donald? Do you want to try this again? He's really making y'all look foolish. But then again, that's not hard to do.


Posted on: 3/15 4:32 pm
_________________
JFK: We will put a man on the moon.

Obama: We will put a man in your daughter's restroom.


Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
4/10/2008 3:02 pm
From Halifax, VA
Posts: 1566
One theory is Trump himself mailed it to the reporter. It sounds logical.

Posted on: 3/15 5:47 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2211
Quote:

Sandstone56 wrote:
Trump lovers aren't conservatives, they don't believe in a balanced budget, Love deficit spending as long as its done by a Republican. Don't believe in freedom of speech, Thinks mentally unstable people should carry guns, They love to be lied to by Trump, Call people who believe in a balanced budgets liberals, Believe a wall will solve all of our problems, Think Russia is our friend and its OK for them to infringe upon our elections. Can anyone think of a four letter word that describes a person such as that?

Sandstone56

Posted on: 3/15 6:12 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
6/26/2010 9:15 am
Posts: 2211
Quote:

Sandstone56 wrote:
One theory is Trump himself mailed it to the reporter. It sounds logical.

Step away from the tin foil.

Posted on: 3/15 6:14 pm
_________________
montani semper liberi
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
4/10/2008 3:02 pm
From Halifax, VA
Posts: 1566
I see that doomsday bunkers have been selling like hotcakes since Trump was elected. Might be a good idea to order yours now. Investing in the company that makes them might also be a good idea. joe, believing a compulsive liar is the height of fantasy. Apparently there's a lot of that in West Virginia these days. I assume you already knew that the Republicans have concluded the wire tapping statement by Trump was false. You likely believed that lie as you did the hundreds of other lies. Enough said.

Posted on: 3/15 6:39 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Grant Ave. Warrior
Joined:
10/27/2006 2:33 pm
From LA
Posts: 1000
You don't see a problem with Trump's 2005 taxes?

3% return rate before the recession? Awful! Can't fix economy. Not smart. Bad businessman!



Posted on: 3/16 7:32 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Party Machine
Joined:
9/2/2007 12:20 am
From Chucktown
Posts: 662
Quote:

delispam wrote:
You don't see a problem with Trump's 2005 taxes?

3% return rate before the recession? Awful! Can't fix economy. Not smart. Bad businessman!




I don't know how you would calculate his roi from what was leaked. The part of the return that leaked is the summary. It leaves out what we would call "the good parts." Seeing schedules c,d,e and other attachments would be interesting. It says very little about where the money came from.

This return mostly just shows that the AMT can be a rat bastard. He's paying 39M in taxes on about 49M of net income. The AMT effectively wiped out the 100M or so of business losses he carried forward.

It does seem odd that this is the return summary that leaked...

As I recall, it was hard to lose money in 2004. It was the middle of an insane speculative bubble. I think the only way to lose money in 2004 was to think you were good at poker because it looked easy on ESPN.

Then again, it was hard to lose money in the casino business in the early-mid 90s, and he managed that (prob where that 100M loss came from), so... improvement?

Posted on: 3/16 9:36 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald

Joined:
12/7/2009 7:07 pm
From Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 12365
Quote:

83Grad wrote:
Well old Donald's taxes turned out to be a big nothing burger. Our lib friends like Sandy must be sooo bummed. The Donald paid FAR more percentage wise in 2005 than Obama, and Bernie the Socialist did in 2015. What's up with your liberal heros? Bernie at 13%!! HAHA he sure played all you rubes. 13%! Give. Me. A. Break. You should be screaming about Bernie's taxes - not Trump's for crying out loud.

$38 MILLION dollars to the fed treasury. I'd say The Donald paid bigly in 2005! The libs should be applauding our President. That's an awful lot of money redistributed to your favorite non-working poor person.

Anymore tax questions for the Donald? Do you want to try this again? He's really making y'all look foolish. But then again, that's not hard to do.



The 2005 taxes really don't matter much. They don't really provide any evidence related to the issues that matter. His more recent tax returns would be more indicative of his current business relationships and other important information. These are a "nothing burger," which is probably why they were "leaked."

Posted on: 3/16 12:58 pm
_________________
Open in new window
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
4/10/2008 3:02 pm
From Halifax, VA
Posts: 1566
While WVU is in the NCAA tournament I don't have time for this crap.

Posted on: 3/16 5:48 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Gettin' Schmitty
Joined:
7/29/2008 4:48 pm
From Deadwood, Lakota Territory
Posts: 8013
Quote:

sg44gold wrote:
The NSA collects lots, and lots, and lots, and lots, and lots (you get the idea) of data for DOD (military).

The Patriot Act and I believe FISA gives the President (as Commander in Chief) authority to REQUEST data that has already been collected.

Or, The President can get a FISA warrant, but it is not always necessary. A simple request is usually all that is necessary.

The FBI would have NO IDEA what the President was doing. I am not even sure the DOJ would be aware of what is going on.

The President can then distribute the data to certain other intelligence agencies. The President's operatives within those agencies can then LEAK the data whenever they want or feel the need to.

But the Russian conspiracy goes deeper than this. And it is actually completely different than everyone is focused on right now. The Russians actually conspired WITH the Soros, Obama, Clinton cartel. The contact and communications with the Trump people were actually "poison pills" planted by the Russians at the behest of the Obama cartel.


And now we know that Susan Rice was aware of what Russian operatives were playing their part and contacting the Trump people. Rice requested the servalance of those Russians operatives and then asked that the Americans be unmasked. Already knowing full well that they were the targeted Trump people. That's how they got Flynn. This collusion runs deep. But it is between the Obama, Soros, Clinton cartel and the Russians to bring down Trump.

Posted on: 4/4 8:41 pm
_________________
Liberal, Progressive, Socialist, Globalist Fascists in BOTH parties are trying to take over the U.S.A.

Help us Eric Cartman, YOU are our only hope.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
4/10/2008 3:02 pm
From Halifax, VA
Posts: 1566
sg44gold.Where did you find that lie, and you knew it was a lie when you posted on this site. Not everyone on this site is dumb.

Posted on: 4/5 4:07 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Gettin' Schmitty
Joined:
7/8/2008 8:36 pm
From Around
Posts: 6127
Quote:

Sandstone56 wrote:
sg44gold.Where did you find that lie, and you knew it was a lie when you posted on this site. Not everyone on this site is dumb.


It's been proven to be true. The lie you're thinking of is when she lied about Benghazi.

Posted on: 4/5 9:31 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
4/10/2008 3:02 pm
From Halifax, VA
Posts: 1566
I don't know of any reputable person or news agency that thinks its true! It don't how many time you repeat a lie its still a lie. Trump keeps repeating his lies and so do a few members of this site.

Posted on: 4/5 10:49 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
7/21/2008 9:57 pm
From North Central, WV
Posts: 1448
Excuse us if we take with a grain of salt your definition of the word reputable. There's so much spin coming from your "reputable" news outlets these days, that they should take up knitting sweaters. At least then they could be serving they're fellow countrymen an actual service.

Posted on: 4/5 8:15 pm
_________________
LET'S GO---------------------------------MOUNTAINEERS---------------
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
4/10/2008 3:02 pm
From Halifax, VA
Posts: 1566
So eery you think the only reputable news come from Trump or the fake news sites! So sad. Tell us which one of the fake news sites you like the best.

Posted on: 4/6 3:53 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
7/21/2008 9:57 pm
From North Central, WV
Posts: 1448
You show me yours and I'll show you mine.

Posted on: 4/7 9:01 am
_________________
LET'S GO---------------------------------MOUNTAINEERS---------------
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Gettin' Schmitty
Joined:
7/8/2008 8:36 pm
From Around
Posts: 6127
Speaking of dangerous.

Trump: 60 missiles-0 unintended casualties. Barry: 1 missile-250 innocent civilians killed. You do the math.

Posted on: 4/7 9:20 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Pitt Hater
Joined:
4/10/2008 3:02 pm
From Halifax, VA
Posts: 1566
Reputable news agencies;
NY Times
Washington Post
ABC News
NBC News
CNN
PBS
To a lesser extent FOX News
Very unreliable; Any of the online sites which are strictly word of mouth or made up stories.
Outright liar Trump and nearly all of his administration.

I happen to approve of the action in Syria and his supreme court nominee.

Posted on: 4/7 11:41 am
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Gettin' Schmitty
Joined:
7/8/2008 8:36 pm
From Around
Posts: 6127
Quote:

Sandstone56 wrote:

I happen to approve of the action in Syria and his supreme court nominee.


Glad to hear it.

Posted on: 4/7 12:22 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 


 
Re: Dangerous Donald
Gettin' Schmitty
Joined:
7/8/2008 8:36 pm
From Around
Posts: 6127
What mass immigration looks like.

https://gfycat.com/CheapMistyBufflehead

Posted on: 4/7 3:49 pm
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer
 



« 1 ... 13 14 15 (16) 17 »




Login
Username:

Password:

remember me





Copyright © 2004-2011 wemustignitethiscouch.com All Rights Reserved